Plea Bargaining

November 26, 2012

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

www.rosenthalwadas.com

(972) 369-0577

A criminal plea negotiation is like any other contractual bargaining discussion meaning at the very least it requires two parties to say “yes” to a singular outcome — or there isn’t a deal.

Prosecutors ask Defendants to waive many constitutional rights — the most important of which to them is a the Defendant’s right to a time and resource consuming trial.  The defendant typically (though not always) seeks certainty, leniency, or to “cut their losses” in plea negotiations.

Plea negotiations based on these bargaining positions are unfortunately a one-sided affair by their very nature.  The Defendant plays with real money and prosecutors play with monopoly money.

An accused has actual money to pay to his/her lawyer, has a possible criminal record in the balance which can cost them a job or income in the future, and obviously an accused has to weigh the possibility of going to prison in some circumstances.

On the other hand prosecutors typically lose very little by losing at trial.  In theory they are public servants and don’t want to be seen losing cases… but very few cases are high-profile enough where the DA’s office or their junior assistants fear any real public backlash.  Some prosecutors, unfortunately, actually see trying weak or bad cases as being tough on crime in their bizarro world because those same prosecutors clearly presume the accused guilty despite the weak evidence in the case.

What does work in an accused favor in plea negotiations is the prosecutors are handling anywhere between 750 and 2,000 cases per court at a time.  This means they’re often seeking the path of least resistance and they can’t possibly try or contest every single case.  They have a choice of being reasonable during plea negotiations or having their docket grind to a halt if they insist on never giving an inch regardless of the reason.

There are other effective ways for an accused to plea bargain.  Many prosecutors are fair and have a decent sense of what is just when presented with proof the accused deserves leniency or another chance.  Many other prosecutors, in contrast to one’s I’ve described above, rightly fear losing in a public forum.  Similarly, the cases a prosecutor fears losing also tend to be more problematic and time consuming for them.  I noticed as a prosecutor when cases were thoroughly researched and investigated by a defense lawyer, trying the case would be frustrating at the very least.  Whether I’d admit or not, my guess is I was more inclined to offer a favorable deal to get of rid such “problem-child” cases.

What does this mean if you’re accused of a crime?  It means you should have a lawyer prepared to do battle on two fronts.  The lawyer should thoroughly investigate the legal and factual defenses of your case… and as a backup, be able to demonstrate to the prosecutor the accused is worthy of leniency even if found to be guilty.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Texas.  Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice. For legal advice about any situation, you should contact an attorney directly.  Contacting the attorney through this forum does not create an attorney-client relationship and any such communications are not considered confidential nor privileged.


A Criminal Conviction and Your Right to Vote in Texas

November 6, 2012

By Collin County Criminal Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

www.rosenthalwadas.com

(972) 369-0577

November 6, 2012

Today is election day so I thought I’d talk about a question I get asked from time to time about how a criminal case might effect someone’s right to vote.

Voting is known in legal terms as a fundamental right.  The cliff’s notes definition of a fundamental right means it is actually spelled out in the U.S. Constitution.  Other examples of fundamental rights are freedom of speech, or the right to freedom of religion.

Fundamental rights aren’t necessarily absolute rights and this is one of the main concepts law students learn in their constitutional law courses.  This means the government can make limitations on those absolute rights in extremely narrow and compelling situations.  For example, a person’s speech can be limited so they don’t yell “fire” in a movie theater and cause a dangerous panic.  We have freedom of religion, but this doesn’t necessarily mean a group is free to physically hurt others in the course of a religious ceremony.

Voting rights are no different.  Our government believes it should be able to limit citizens ability to vote in certain situations.  Texas Election Code 11.002 defines “qualified voters.”

In terms of a felony situation, a “qualified voter” is a person who:

“has not been finally convicted of a felony or, if so convicted, has:

(A)  fully discharged the person’s sentence, including any term of incarceration, parole, or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by any court; or

(B)  been pardoned or otherwise released from the resulting disability to vote;”

The plain language makes clear once someone’s “debt to society” is paid in Texas, then their right to vote is restored.  Also, the Texas Secretary of State points out in a memorandum for the public about voting rights in felony situations:

  • A conviction on appeal is not considered a final felony conviction.
  • “Deferred adjudication” is not considered a final felony conviction. Article 42.12, Section 5, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
  • Mere prosecution, indictment or other criminal procedures leading up to, but not yet resulting in the final conviction, are not final felony convictions.

Some claim nationwide preventing felons from voting is a form of voter disenfranchisement to the tune of around 5 million potential voters.  Here’s an article a bit more academic in nature which can give you specifics on those laws around the country.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice about any situation you should contact an attorney directly. Communications sent through this forum are not privileged nor confidential in nature.  Communicating with attorney through this forum does not create an attorney-client relationship.